Champdogs Information Exchange - Not logged in
Forum Breeders Help Search Register Login
Previous Next Up Topic Dog Boards / General / Champdogs Forum 10th Anniversary Reunion
By MarkR (Administrator) [gb] Date 05.11.09 12:06 GMT Edited 05.11.09 12:12 GMT
Inspired by the When did you join Champdogs ? & Missing Members threads and amongst other things the comment by ceejay:

"nice to see some folks posting here that we haven't seen for a while"

I thought it might be an idea to see if we can contact some of the old members who we haven't seen on here for a while. A sort of old school reunion to celebrate Champdogs 10th anniversary.

Some of the people who are mentioned in those threads and who no longer post are still members. Maybe a PM from one or two of you might entice them to come back and contribute. Perhaps you have an email address or a phone number for a long forgotten member ?

With reunions there is always the worry about how many people will turn up. How many ex champdoggers do you think we can get back to their keyboards, any advance on 50 ?

And what are the odds on a "playground fight", or will old differences be forgotten ? :-)  
By Cava14Una (****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 12:37 GMT
Oh great idea!! I can think of 2 I can contact which may well lead to a few more :-D
Anne in Scotland with Beardies and rats <:3( )~
By Blue (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 13:02 GMT
Good Idea Mark.  
By Jeangenie (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 13:19 GMT
How do we know whether the people we miss are still members? Is there a memberlist anywhere on site?
A closed mouth gathers no feet
By MarkR (Administrator) [gb] Date 05.11.09 15:04 GMT
"How do we know whether the people we miss are still members?"

Just put their username in the Google Sitesearch at the bottom of this page and you should find one of their old posts. Then click on their name and it will tell you whether they are still a member.
By ShaynLola (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 15:21 GMT

>Just put their username in the Google Sitesearch at the bottom of this page and you should find one of their old posts. Then click on their name and it will tell you whether they are still a member.


I've just tried that with a couple of names that I know are no longer members for one reason or another but they still show as if they are still members confused
Opportunity knocks...
Temptation kicks down the door
By Lokis mum (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 17:30 GMT
Shame really ...a couple of people have been banned that imo should not have been ...but I suppose if there were to be a Grand Reconcilation Celebration and bans were lifted, bans would have to be lifted all round :-(

But hey - what do I know ?  
Treat every stressful situation as a dog would. Pee on it and walk away
By kayc (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 17:54 GMT
what about an amnesty :-)
Kay (Never under-estimate the power of stupid people in large groups) ;-)
By Lokis mum (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 17:58 GMT
Good idea Kay ....but what about the Multiple Personality Posters ...would they be able to cope :-D
Treat every stressful situation as a dog would. Pee on it and walk away
By LJS (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 21:07 GMT
"How do we know whether the people we miss are still members?"

Just put their username in the Google Sitesearch at the bottom of this page and you should find one of their old posts. Then click on their name and it will tell you whether they are still a member.


So do we encourage banned members to log in under a new user name ( as so many people have done ;-) ) or can we ask for the user to be reactivated then Mark ? :-)
By Daisy (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 22:08 GMT
An amnesty would be a very good idea :-)

Daisy
You grow up the day you have your first real laugh, at yourself
Trop de paroles noient la vérité.
By Blue (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 23:35 GMT
I am sure I go around with my eyes shut :-) who have I missed, mind you I rarely notice the banned ones disappear :-)

Lucy were you 2001 also , I seem to remember that..
By Blue (*****) [gb] Date 05.11.09 23:36 GMT
Lucy were you 2001 also , I seem to remember that.. crickey I am on the wrong thread  :-D this phone of mine I get confused on it.. :-)
By Cava14Una (****) [gb] Date 06.11.09 08:32 GMT
I've mailed 3 people so we will see what comes of it ;-)
Anne in Scotland with Beardies and rats <:3( )~
By Blue (*****) [gb] Date 06.11.09 10:29 GMT
Great Anne :-)
By Lokis mum (*****) [gb] Date 07.11.09 10:19 GMT
Mark - is there an amnesty for "banned" members???
Treat every stressful situation as a dog would. Pee on it and walk away
By Oldilocks (****) [gb] Date 07.11.09 10:45 GMT

> Mark - is there an amnesty for "banned" members???


If there isn't there should be IMO.  When you think of some of the things that the existing members have written, I can't see how anyone who is banned could have written any worse to be honest.  That is assuming that some of the 'banned' members will even want to come back.  :-)
By MarkR (Administrator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 08:16 GMT
No amnesty I am afraid.
By Lokis mum (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 10:38 GMT
Well I know for certain that one banned member (at least) rejoined under a pseudonym eek   would still appear to be a member ...
Treat every stressful situation as a dog would. Pee on it and walk away
By Lea (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 12:58 GMT
Thats a shame as there are at least 5 banned members that have rejoined under other names. Although it is a fun game spotting banned members! Think one has rejoined at least 3 times after being banned each time! Lol :-) its a shame the well respected ones that do follow their ban cant have amnesty on their bans! Lol lea :-)
Dogs running dogs running dogs!!!!!!
By Oldilocks (****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 13:37 GMT

> No amnesty I am afraid.


What a pity.  :-(
By Lokis mum (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 13:57 GMT
So....those that are devious and have re-joined under another name/s get away with it - correct?
Treat every stressful situation as a dog would. Pee on it and walk away
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 14:07 GMT
So you want everyone who is been banned back?
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By Oldilocks (****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 14:11 GMT
As a previous poster has already said, there have been banned members joining back under different usernames, so what is the difference in allowing all banned mambers to come back if they wish?
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 14:15 GMT
Are the moderators mind readers or admin for that matter do we always recognise members that have previously been banned or are we supposed to play guessing games aswell???
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By Lokis mum (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 14:25 GMT
No Gill - au contraire!  But when it's pointed out to Admin that a "banned" member has reappeared ......
Treat every stressful situation as a dog would. Pee on it and walk away
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 14:29 GMT
Every member that has been banned has had more than one complaint made against them. Do we  want these ignored from now on should we have no moderation do we want a free for all? Or do we accept that not everyone will agree when a member is banned but there needs to be someone somewhere that draws a line ?
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By ClaireyS (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 17:05 GMT

>Thats a shame as there are at least 5 banned members that have rejoined under other names.


im so dense, I havent recognised any !
finally got my 5th silver 7 ..... 2 and a half stone off, only 8lbs to goal ... bring it on !
By Oldilocks (****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 17:20 GMT

> Every member that has been banned has had more than one complaint made against them. Do we&nbsp; want these ignored from now on should we have no moderation do we want a free for all?


Of course not, but if there is to be a "10th Anniversary Reunion" it would be lovely if everyone were invited back including the ones who have accepted their ban and not rejoined under another username. :-)
By Lea (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 17:28 GMT
One re signed in banned member at least has been 'outed' in front of Admin, but nothings been done about it.
So if they can blatently get away with it, then why cant the members that had been here for a long time and not been blatently rude like the latest person banned have a amnesty (am not talking about the trolls!!!!)
Lea :-) :-)
Dogs running dogs running dogs!!!!!!
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 17:35 GMT
Well the decision has been made. 
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By Jeangenie (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 18:53 GMT
The passionate debates (I for one enjoy debating as long as it remains civil and there's no name-calling!) did at least get more 'hits' for the site.
A closed mouth gathers no feet
By ceejay (****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 19:12 GMT
Yes JG I was just composing something along those lines myself when I pressed the wrong button and screen closed up on me.  As for multiple personality posters Margot - I would never have guessed.  If you had a reunion Mark - what form would it take - news updates?  A good debate - but what would that be?   CD is the best dog forum - debate!!! :-) 
By Daisy (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 20:08 GMT Edited 09.11.09 20:12 GMT

> Every member that has been banned has had more than one complaint made against them


Complaining about someone is easy :-) It's whether the complaint is justified that is important. What if there are more members who support the person than those who complain ??? We don't have a chance to voice our support as there is no public announcement when someone is banned or about to be banned :-( Surely if a banned person has a lot of support from members their reinstatement should be considered ???? Or is that just a bit too democratic ? :-)

Daisy
You grow up the day you have your first real laugh, at yourself
Trop de paroles noient la vérité.
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 21:20 GMT Edited 09.11.09 21:31 GMT
And what are the odds on a "playground fight"
Ho Hum
No I will edit this as that was childish of me also. Sorry
But it seems everyone wants it both ways they want to complain about posters and want them banned when it suits them but if they happen to like the poster that someone else is having problems with then thats ok the other persons complaint shouldnt count.
edited again to say I have no idea who apart from MM has been banned recently so not commenting on any particular person.
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By dogs a babe (****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 21:38 GMT
What is the criteria for banning someone?

Is it multiple complaints about a member posting on one topic OR is it multiple complaints over a period of time and range of topics?  Do the ignore lists get taken into consideration too?

I suppose I'm wondering if a ban may be as a result of a one off lapse in judgement or if they'd need to be a persistant offender...
Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see ~Mark Twain
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 21:39 GMT
Hit the nail on the head dogs a babe
multiple complaints over a period of time and ignore list
Oh Edited again ( seem to be doing that alot tonight) Short term bans have been used at times also
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By dogs a babe (****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 21:46 GMT
Thank you - your edited bit was my next question!!

Finally - are they 'warned' first?  I know that the mods often post a plea for calm and consideration etc within the topic itself but wondered if the poster has some notice that a ban may follow unless they make some changes to their posting behaviour.
Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see ~Mark Twain
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 21:51 GMT
What can be read on the forums is far from being the full picture of any of these decisions and of course we confer with each other and the people concerned. Admin makes the final decision
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By Jeangenie (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 22:35 GMT

>But it seems everyone wants it both ways they want to complain about posters and want them banned when it suits them


I don't actually think banning is the best thing to do if people are just irritating or whether someone doesn't agree with their posts and complains. That seems a bit like running to teacher, telling tales. If it was up to me (probably just as well it isn't, eh? ;-)) people would only be banned for promoting illegal activities, etc, not just being a pain in the neck.

Just my two penn'orth. :-) Feel free to ignore it!
A closed mouth gathers no feet
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 09.11.09 22:49 GMT
I dont make the rules JG and I dont get the benefit of ignoring  people otherwise how would I know if they need a quiet nudge in the right direction ;-)
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By HuskyGal (*****) [gb] Date 09.11.09 23:21 GMT
                                          *Looking increasingly worried*
Can I just say... I'm stood here with an arm full of gin bottles and cheesey footballs (oooh yes Faaaancy nibbles!)
In readiness for a party and now me cheesey balls look in danger of being swiped and used as Missiles!!!! eek

All joking aside it would appear a re-clarification of 'problem solving' and grievances is needed, to fight present fires but also prevent future?

Mark:
I would like to request a (in bold blue) thread for suggestions for ways to celebrate the 10th Anniversary :-)
  Recents threads of DFS Crufts got me thinking about our home made champdogs badges and thought it would be a good idea maybe for you guys to source actual badges of an anniversary issue.... you never know with a fair few folk wearing them round and about it may even drum up new business? So people can wear them not just at Crufts but at shows as well?

Oh and can we have the chat room back 'for a limited time only' so we can running commentary on the Crufts TV. Mind you is it better in a thread? as the chat doesn't save and it was good returning from Crufts and reading what others had thought.... Hmmm ok this ones not one of my better suggestions!

But you see what I mean.... Lets get some suggestions going!
I want a party!!!! and stuff!!!!!! :-D
Running'Idita-choc' Sled race with Lori!..~¤řCheer for Scotland's Wattie in the Iditarod!¤ř~
By STARRYEYES (*****) [gb] Date 11.11.09 13:50 GMT
JUST LIKE YOU....LIV TO WANT TO PART..AAAAAY.... :-)
Faithful and true to the last beat of his heart.
By king of bling (***) [gb] Date 11.11.09 14:42 GMT
Champdogs party cool!!
By dexter (****) [gb] Date 11.11.09 18:54 GMT

> I want a party!!!! and stuff!!!!!! :-D


Hell yeah......LOL
By JeanSW (****) [gb] Date 14.11.09 15:17 GMT

> Well the decision has been made.&nbsp;


I agree.  If people were banned, then they were on more than one persons ignore list.
The hurrier I go - the behinder I get!
By Blue (*****) [gb] Date 14.11.09 18:18 GMT Edited 14.11.09 18:23 GMT
Ditto JeanSW,

To be honest I never notice people coming or going so never knew or know who is just now or has been banned BUT I have been a member here for a long long time now and I think moderation of the board is very relaxed compared to some forums, because of this I believe those banned must have deserved it.  Although using JG words I am not actually disagreeing or picking at her post , I just don't think Admin or the moderators ban people just because they are, "irritating or whether someone doesn't agree with their posts and complains" 

This is probably nothing to do with anyone being banned but I have seen some threads take a "bullying" approach and it was happening quite often and threads being argued one way by a few then the next week contradicting what was said the weekend before, purely it would seem to battle it out for the sake of it and generally when the OP or subject what is way past debating. Disagreeing for the sake of it doesn't bring enjoyment to the board whatsoever for anyone.  Just spoiling it for everyone really.  Those that think they don't do it or have not seen it for me it really doesn't matter as it has been happening. 

I don't do the " how wonderful" comments generally but I have to applaud the way the board is run. Yes there are times things will be missed but humans were not born with eyes on the back of their head :-)
By JeanSW (****) [gb] Date 14.11.09 21:58 GMT

> I have to applaud the way the board is run


Same here.
The hurrier I go - the behinder I get!
By @Melodysk (Moderator) [gb] Date 17.11.09 10:41 GMT
Can I just say here that over my many years here both as a member and as a Mod, I have seen people come and people go, some of their own volition some being a bit more *cough* forcibly ejected but...and this is the big one, the board carries on...new folks come in to replace the others.

No one is or has been banned for one simple mistake or for one comment on a thread that went awry :-) The decision to remove a poster is rarely easy and the Mod and Admin team know that there will be the inevitable outcry from friends of the person but it is always for the greater good of the board in the long run

Melody - making a rare post nowadays :-) Oh and yes, I was banned for a few days many years ago :-) :-)
Now a 6th Form Adminstrator and still mum to 2 Mad Mallies
Previous Next Up Topic Dog Boards / General / Champdogs Forum 10th Anniversary Reunion


Tweet This Thread

Powered by mwForum 2.12.1 © 1999-2007 Markus Wichitill