> But what would others do and do you think i am being over protective ?
Nope wouldn't catch me doing that, if one of my sons was ill and at home the dog/s were taken by my mum or one of my brothers for a walk, or left to watch over my son whilst I took the dogs.
> He is a very sensible 10 yr old so i have no fears he would get up to anything wrong but i would worry someone undesirable would come to the door whilst he was alone.
as boys mature slower than girls. However, I have recently heard of a mother who left her 15 year old daughter at home so that she could go to work. There a small fire in the kitchen and the mother was going to be charged with child abandonment. 
> There is no hard and fast rule. I spoke to the police about this a few years ago as my neighbour was leaving her daughters alone regularly as she went to work. they were 12 and 10 years old. The police stated that as long as they were sensible, and didn't get into trouble, then they were happy with this. They then went on to say that girls could be left at 10, if the parents felt like they were mature enough, but they recommended that boys be at least 12 <IMG alt="eek" src="/images/eek.gif"/> <IMG alt="
" src="/images/default/sml_wnk.png" class="sml"/> as boys mature slower than girls. However, I have recently heard of a mother who left her 15 year old daughter at home so that she could go to work. There a small fire in the kitchen and the mother was going to be charged with child abandonment.
>
>there is no clarification in Scots law about the age a child can be left.
Start off by popping out for 5 minutes, then increase it until you can happily go out and leave children. Nowadays most people have mobiles so you can always be contacted.
> Pinky you are so right, I hate it when children are given the huge responsibility of 'looking after' the younger ones.
>
> Even at 12, 10 and 8 yrs I was still walking them to school because although the 12 yr old MAY have had enough sense to care for herself she could not watch out for the others.
> Much as I love the dogs that I now have if I had them at the same time as the kids then the kids always have to come first.
There is also another side, what if something happened to you on the dog walk, what if you slipped and twisted/broke your leg/ankle? (has happend to many) What if the dog is attacked? Or you are attacked? What if you need to help someone else? These are all OTT scenarios and unlikely to happen, but they do happen, and another reason why I would not leave a sick child at home alone, being left in a panic after receiveing a phone call, whilst I was awaiting emergency services it is not something he/she needs. Or if I were knocked out or something, the child is left worrying where I was.
(I did have a stalker once) but he likes to make sure I am home safe, after all we generally walk in secluded areas. I love my dog walks and the country air, but there is always a little worry in the back of my mind of things that could happen, I would never wish for a sick child home alone to have to cope with anything like that.
> As people have said, it all depends on the individual child. Their mental capabilities haven't changed for centuries, and it's not that long ago (certainly within living memory) that children could leave school at 14 and get a full-time job. They're still just as capable of learning about personal safety and common-sense as their grandparents and great-grandparents were.
. I'm quite lucky as my parents live in a granny flat right next door to us so the girls could be left alone without really being alone, but even then if we were away overnight my mum slept in our house or the girls slept in their spare room. My elder daughter was left completely on her own for two nights when she was 17, the younger one may never be
Powered by mwForum 2.12.1 © 1999-2007 Markus Wichitill