I know you are all much more expeienced and dog knowledgable than us so I though perhaps you could help us match up?
)> existing dogs (cavaliers will be 3 and a half and 4)
>
>The problem is that as there is no leader then when they argue neither will back down.
>
> You should take on leadership and not allow the dogs get into the situation in the first place. If you're not leading your pack, it will end in chaos.
> What do your dogs "fight" about?
> Doesn't work like that. Humans have no place in a dog pack as dogs know full well we are human and not dogs.
>We have looked at Weimaraners, Viszlas, Pointers, Labradors and although not in the gundog group we like >dobes, ddb

>If it is a lab or a weim then I have a couple I can "borrow" for a short while but they regularly mix with these >and are happy to be bossed around even in their own home.

> With all three breeds a spat between the larger dog and one of the Cavaliers could potentially result in a dead Cav all it takes is one snap, such is the size difference. I have known this happen in rough play where one breed was so much larger and more dominant with heartbreaking results
> This might well be the case, for the dogs you know, but there is a vast difference between a visiting dog and one that lives with you permanently, you also cannot guarantee that any pup you get will mature to have the same temperament as the ones you presently know

> I do think also that you really need to consider your own temperament and that of your OH and family when considering a new breed. By your own admission you have had to resort to more than one behaviourist for a breed that many would consider very 'easy' to live with, yet you have some of the most challenging large breeds on your wish list. Are you confident that you are the right people to own one of these breeds?
More is not always better 

> Our vet recommended a Stafford
> Frenchies are not much smaller than a Staff bitch
> As Cavs are less likely to challenge a more dominant breed it might actually solve the issue of there being no obvious boss dog, and I expect it varies and you need to research your breed lines fr dogs that are good mixers.
>

>>One of our regular posters found her boys falling out when she got a bitch puppy, they were a Cavalier and an American cocker who had previously got on well.
> Yes, that's me
>it would be lovely to have a breed with a coat that just needed a rub down with a rubber brush.
> That's just an aside though. As for possible breeds for you to think about. Of your list I think I'd be considering a doberman bitch. I admit I've never owned one but there are several that I meet on the park that seem very good natured and exercise off lead mixing with other dogs no problem. I know the dogs can have a tendency to be dog aggressive but all I can say is the bitches I've met recently have really made me consider getting one in the future. There may be easier breeds to own but a dobe does have the advantage of being a deterrent to ne'er do wells which perhaps a pointer or similar doesn't maybe.Another possibility might be a ridgeback ?
>
>
)> Personally I also like sight hounds - or maybe things like the Pharaoh hound - or just a collie/greyhound lurcher.
> Have you considered a whippet? A handy size, smooth easy-care coat, and generally with a delightful temperament with dogs and people.
>I would appreciate it if this post could remain friendly and not a "dig" at the way I have raised my dogs as I find >that quite hurtful.
>>knew it was, didn't want to name names without asking
>>Did you get the bitch as a puppy? What breed was the bitch? How old were your boys?
> My post was in no way meant to be a 'Dig', unfriendly or hurtful, if you did a search on my name you would know that to be the case
> I gave an honest appraisal of the breeds you mentioned
> No probs - just endorsing your opinion. My two are ok together 99% of the time, but when they go, they mean it, and I couldn't cope with it if they weren't small dogs!
> So ideally you want a medium - large dog with a short or easy care coat and not as demanding as say a collie ? Something that is relatively trainable or at least something that is not known as having a tendency to dog aggression or chasing livestock ? No requirement for it to act as a guard/deterrent (I know many dogs will bark but some have an appearance that is more of a deterrent than others) ?
>
> Beagles make excellent, if stubborn, pets
> No, ours really mean it - they used to draw blood and have to be dragged apart.
, I hope you didn't think I was implying that yours didn't mean it (I wasn't)
>>I hope you didn't think I was implying that yours didn't mean it (I wasn't)
> I can see that regardless of my reassurance that our situation is coming under control and the fact that our behaviourist who has seen our dogs in the flesh does not see this as a problem I am forever going to get debates on whether I should/shouldn't get a dog.
> I think that advice from owners who have experience is always worth considering. I know that we/they may not have seen the situation at first hand but we've all read your threads with interest and concern. It's clear that at times, you'd reached the end of your tether and found it very difficult to manage the emotion and the responsibility.
>
> Even though it may seem that you are on top of the problem now, dogs can and will surprise you. 2 steps forward, one step back is not unusual AND introducing another dog will completely change the dynamic in your household. No one that I have read is saying don't get another dog but simply reminding you to exercise extreme caution; wait until you are a year further on at least, and have completely settled your current doggy duo.
>
Powered by mwForum 2.12.1 © 1999-2007 Markus Wichitill