Champdogs Information Exchange - Not logged in
Forum Board Index Breeders Active Topics Help Search Register Login
Previous Next Up Topic Other Boards / Feedback / Red Stars
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 11:16 GMT
Don't know what they are for but I guess it is the number of posts you have made, if so why has my number dropped from 4 to 3? Not that it matters but I am a bit puzzled. Does it mean that a load of my posts have been deleted?
Jackie H
By Cava14Una (***) [gb] Date 01.08.10 11:49 GMT
Wonder if it's todo with forum where threads are deleted periodically?
Anne in Scotland with Beardies and rats <:3( )~
By MarkR (Administrator) [gb] Date 01.08.10 11:59 GMT
The number boundaries have changed.

1 star  - 50 posts
2 stars - 250 posts
3 stars - 1000 posts
4 stars - 5000 posts
5 stars - 25000 posts
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 12:07 GMT
Oh! if that happened this morning that is why the change, you know when I used to post under my affix I don't remember there being any stars at all it was only after I came back and used a different user name that I noticed them at all. As I said unimportant but I wondered if posts were being deleted and if so perhaps I had better use the search and print some of those I go back to every now and again.
Jackie H
By suejaw (****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 15:43 GMT
I've only just noticed this, I was on 5 and now down to 3!!.. Not that it matters at all, shows that I like to talk (too much sometimes)...
Just wondered if we need stars though? Does it make any difference to anyone whether we have them or not?
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 16:22 GMT
Can't see it is of any help, it does not tell you the experience of the poster only the amount they post - as I said I am sure that when I posted on here under my affix there were none but my memory is not what it was. Think you soon find out the posters who are of help and whose opinions you trust and I would think it would be different people for each of us as we are likely to agree with those who agree to us. 
Jackie H
By Paula (**) [gb] Date 01.08.10 18:01 GMT
25000 posts!!!!

Blimey, I'll be 95 before I get there!!!

ok, so I posted this to find out how many I've got now!
Meine Meinung steht fest, BITTE verwirren Sie mich nicht mit Tatsachen.
By Jacque (*) [gb] Date 01.08.10 18:18 GMT
Had to do a post to see if i have a star yet, or a must try harder :P
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 18:20 GMT
LOL Paula, at my age I would not stand a chance, would have to be posting 24/7 and I still would not live long enough, have my doubts I would even get my 4 back. TBH I had no idea what they were for anyway so it is not that much of a worry but I will steer clear of any 5 star owner for fear of not getting a word in edgeways. :-)
Jackie H
By Jeangenie (*****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 18:23 GMT

>I will steer clear of any 5 star owner for fear of not getting a word in edgeways. 


Oi! ;-) :-D
A closed mouth gathers no feet
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 18:26 GMT
Well I know from personal experience that Brainless can talk for England so I exclude her and you are excused because you are an old hand - OK have I retrieved myself.
Jackie H
By ali-t (***) [gb] Date 01.08.10 20:42 GMT
just checking my star status...
The artist formerly known as cheekychow! - with a staffy and a rottie not a chow, but very cheeky!
By furriefriends (***) [gb] Date 01.08.10 21:23 GMT
Just wondering about my stars
By Brainless (*****) [gb] Date 01.08.10 23:31 GMT

> Well I know from personal experience that Brainless can talk for England so I exclude her


Guilty ;-)

Edited to add: Posts 27906 since Registered 13.08.01.
Barbara and the Grey Curly Tails.
By Paula (**) [gb] Date 02.08.10 15:21 GMT
I've got to more than double what I've already posted between 2003 and now just to get one more star!!!! Another seven years before I get to three stars!!!
Meine Meinung steht fest, BITTE verwirren Sie mich nicht mit Tatsachen.
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 02.08.10 16:34 GMT
Ah! Paula that is depressing - I'd give you a star any time if it would cheer you up.
Jackie H
By kayc (****) [gb] Date 02.08.10 18:19 GMT
I have dropped from 5 to 3, I feel positively naked eek :-)
Kay (Never under-estimate the power of stupid people in large groups) ;-)
By Paula (**) [gb] Date 02.08.10 19:19 GMT
Thanks Jackie, it would cheer me up no end :-D

passes kay my two start to cover up with!
Meine Meinung steht fest, BITTE verwirren Sie mich nicht mit Tatsachen.
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 02.08.10 20:07 GMT
>I have dropped from 5 to 3, I feel positively naked <

How embarrassing, it is too delicate to ask where you have lost them from but one can imagine - we had all be sure to hang on to the remaining ones or who knows what we will be exposing might even be a bigger flag. :-o
Jackie H
By HuskyGal (****) [gb] Date 02.08.10 20:42 GMT

> I feel positively naked <img src="/images/eek.gif" alt="eek"> <img class="sml" src="/images/default/sml_pos.png" alt=":-)">


Champdogs Calendar girls!!! :-D
ROFL!
Running'Idita-choc' Sled race with Lori!~Supporting the Emergency Services Police,Ambulance&Fire~
By ShaynLola (***) [gb] Date 03.08.10 06:56 GMT Edited 03.08.10 07:00 GMT

>Champdogs Calendar girls!!!


ROFL!  Not sure the world is ready for that! Although, if we were doing a CD Calendar Girls, you should be very glad that I have a giant breed :-D
Opportunity knocks...
Temptation kicks down the door
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 03.08.10 07:29 GMT Edited 03.08.10 07:35 GMT
Well, you and I do have 3 stars and a flag to help retain our dignity just imaging how those who have dropped to one star must feel. Do think this sudden stripping of our assets have left some feeling out in the cold perhaps the vigour of the stripping was too large.

On a more serious note I do wonder why the need to make this reduction - when I look at a new forum I judge it by the number of posters who have obviously been on that forum for a long while, (the number of 4 & 5 stars around). If there are loads then I feel the forum may be worth joining but if there are only a few I give it a wide berth so I do wonder why this has proved necessary. Dare say there is some technical reason for the downgrading or perhaps there is a need to thin out the numbers.
Jackie H
By Jeangenie (*****) [gb] Date 03.08.10 07:36 GMT Edited 03.08.10 07:38 GMT
If you just read Unread Posts then you don't see the stars anyway, so it makes no difference. :-)

Oh - and never confuse quantity of posts with quality of posts ... ;-) :-D (No names mentioned!!)
A closed mouth gathers no feet
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 03.08.10 07:46 GMT
>If you just read Unread Posts then you don't see the stars anyway, so it makes no difference

Now I always use the Active topics, not that it makes any difference I have been on this site so long it is of no interest. Do take your second point and feel this may be inclined to increase the amount of quantity only posts - mind you there should be room for fun posts surely.

Mind you if this hike is to try to decrease the number of nonsense posts it may well back fire. There obviously was a good reason and my nature means I am curious and wonder what it was, probably something very boring like bandwidth or something :-)
Jackie H
By cornishmals (***) [gb] Date 03.08.10 08:10 GMT
Well just popped on the forum for a gander and shocked to find my demotion to 2 stars.I have be talking jibberish for the last 2 months hoping to become a 4 star wonder (Joking what I say is VERY important and world changing LOL).
Has the font changed when you type in a comment or is it my eyes?
Only another 485 posts and I am back where I was on Sunday.
Properly trained,a man can be a dogs best friend.
By kayc (****) [gb] Date 03.08.10 08:58 GMT

> Now I always use the Active topics, not that it makes any difference I have been on this site so long it is of no interest


snap.. I have never taken notice of the stars, only looked for mine because of this thread

>mind you there should be room for fun posts surely,


Absolutely, which is why we have foo and idle chat.. we need a bit of lighthearted banter now and again...

The problem with the star system, is that there are a few, and they are in the minority who simply need/want all those stars above their name... and post just for the sake of it.. and sometimes it can be detrimental to a thread.. those who type.. **sorry can't help, or nothing constructive to say** etc.. why bother posting if you have nothing to offer the OP...

Now at least, it will take them years to get another star.. so its not a bad thing at all.. at least the stars will hopefully mean something in the future.. Quality answers, not quantity posting...

maybe even eliminating the star system for foo and idle chat replies.. so those threads don't contribute towards the overall 'target'  (for those who are aiming for a target)  ;-)
Kay (Never under-estimate the power of stupid people in large groups) ;-)
By satincollie (Moderator) [gb] Date 03.08.10 09:34 GMT
Some of us dont get any stars :-p
Anybody who doesn't know what soap tastes like never washed a dog- Franklin P. Jones
Gill :-D
By Nova (****) [gb] Date 03.08.10 09:54 GMT
>Some of us dont get any stars <


Oh, my word, totally naked moderators :-0

Will someone PLEASE tell me how to do a quote without all the attendant salad? PLEASE Oops!! and smilies by the look of it (blush)
Jackie H
By kayc (****) [gb] Date 03.08.10 10:01 GMT

> Some of us dont get any stars


Mark.. your moderators are complaining.. keep them in line please :-p

I think the mods should have a huge gold star :-)
Kay (Never under-estimate the power of stupid people in large groups) ;-)
By Brainless (*****) [gb] Date 03.08.10 10:26 GMT

> Oh - and never confuse quantity of posts with quality of posts ... ;-) :-D (No names mentioned!!)


he he he ;-)
Barbara and the Grey Curly Tails.
Previous Next Up Topic Other Boards / Feedback / Red Stars
About Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

Powered by mwForum 2.12.1 © 1999-2007 Markus Wichitill