Champdogs Information Exchange - Not logged in
Forum Breeders Help Search Register Login
Previous Next Up Topic Dog Boards / Behaviour / IRRESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR (locked)
By sam (*****) [gb] Date 22.04.02 12:26 GMT
Following the recent sheep chasing posts, this might be of interest. Our neighbours daughter visited her parents for the weekend & asked if she could walk along the river. We said yes, as long as she stayed out of the lambing field. Next thing we knew, she had taken her boxer in the lamb field, let it off the lead and we had a ewe in the river. managed to get her out but badly bitten on the face & died within a couple of hours. I now have 3 orphan lambs to rear as well as everything else! I was livid, my other half was bordering on murder, (both the boxer & its owner!) and the silly woman said, "oh dear, he did that last time he saw a sheep too, but we took him to a behaviorist & she said it was probably a one off & not to worry as we live in the town"
And you wonder why I am so scathing of behaviorists in my other posts!!!!!!!
Anyway, got it off my chest now, but boy am I angry over this.
By eoghania [de] Date 22.04.02 12:36 GMT
Oh, Sam, I'm so sorry for you. Your poor ewe & her lambs. I can't believe the daughter went ahead and let the dog off lead & in the sheep field right after you said not to!!! It sounds like the whole family is not quite in touch with reality.

I wish I could say something that would make you feel better. If I could, I"d be over to help you with the lambs....but I'm too far away from you :-(
good luck,
sara
By Ingrid (****) [gb] Date 22.04.02 12:36 GMT
Sam, you have every right to be angry, hope they are paying for the damage they have caused you and your time. It really annoyed me in the other post when the vet said they were lucky not to get caught, don't people realise this is someone's livelihood they are threatening. Having helped a friend clear up after a dog got in with pregnant ewes, I know that they can cause untold damage even if they don't savage the sheep, two of my present dogs were cured permanently by running into an electric fence, sounds harsh but it worked they now shy away from sheep.
By Claire B (****) [gb] Date 22.04.02 12:46 GMT
God Sam no wonder you are mad. What a stupid girl to let her dog off the lead, never mind what the behavourist said and the fact her dog had chased sheep before she shouldn't have let her dog off the lead in the blumming first place. My dogs have never chased sheep but that doesn't mean I'll walk in a field full of sheep and let them off the lead :rolleyes:

God what a muppet! And the poor ewe and lambs. Does the girl understand what she has done mad

I hope you manage okay, have you got some help?
By eoghania [de] Date 22.04.02 12:55 GMT
Sam,
Ingrid has a good point about compensation. Personally, I think that sometimes money changing hands doesn't educate or help create feelings of responsibility. How about the girl & maybe her mum, getting in and doing some labor for you, like helping to clean & feed the sheep. I think the daughter really owes you some serious compensation for breaking her promise & being stupid to let the dog off its leash.
Money + labor = true remorse?
Just a thought.
toodles cool
By issysmum [gb] Date 22.04.02 13:30 GMT
Oh Sam, I'm not surprised you and your bloke were furious, of all the stupid things to do.

If I were you I'd sue them to try to recover some of the value of the ewe - maybe that'll make her think twice before she lets her dog of the lead. I'd also think about suing the behaviourist that said it was just a one-off. He/she obviously doesn't know much about animals.

If you need a hand feeding the lambs, just let me know - I'm good with a bottle :D :D :D

Fiona
x x x
By patricia [gb] Date 22.04.02 13:36 GMT
Things like this really annoy me, you have a supposedly good dog owner? they know their Dog is suspect with farm animals, and they still insist on letting the dog off in a field.
Even if my dog was good with lambs, I would still not let him into a field to scare the lambs they are such timid creatures. Well I would hit them in the pocket claim for the poor old sheep.

Pat
By sam (*****) [gb] Date 23.04.02 08:44 GMT
Well, to be honest, sueing people left right & centre is not the way we do things round here.......not advocates of all this modern way of life.....hell it took 10 years to get a computer!!!
I know everyone has their own way of dealing with theses problems, and now other half has calmed down a bit, the lambs are doing ok on bottle
( just two, managed to foster one onto a ewe with dead lamb). The neighbour has paid us £40 for the ewe, well she was old, and we have asked that the dog is not let loose in, or adjacent to any of our land, although we obviously cannot stop her taking it on the moor. Hope the mention of "shooting sheep chasers" has had desired effect! Basically we still have to live/work next to theses people so no point in making an enemy of them. When we are gathering, they often bring stock back for us, like wise they will turn out in the night to assist calving etc, so no point in creating more bad feeling.
By patricia [gb] Date 23.04.02 10:31 GMT
Well done Sam, And good news on the baby lambs.One stupid act gives such a knock on effect.

Pat
By Claire B (****) [gb] Date 23.04.02 10:49 GMT
I understand what you are saying Sam, there's nothing worse than having a major fallout with neighbours when you have to live so close to them, I hope their daughter feels bad about it though.

I hope the lambs continue to thrive. Well Done. :-)
By Zicos Mum [gb] Date 22.04.02 14:02 GMT
Sam,

I used to own a horse, he was turned out in 40 acres with other animals and one day, without letting me know, the farmer introduced 300 new sheep to the grazing. Of course, he was perfectly within his rights to do this, however what happened next could have been prevented. My gelding protected his 'mares' and lashed out at a ewe who strayed too close, killing it outright. :-( My point is that I had to compensate the farmer for the loss of the ewe because of the actions of my horse.

Personally I don't think the above case is nearly so clear-cut as yours. In your case the dog walker surely is responsible for her actions and therefore should compensate you (as far as money can) accordingly?
By Leigh Date 22.04.02 14:14 GMT
Maybe you could *sue* the behaviourist. Good luck with the lambs :-)
By Denise [gb] Date 22.04.02 15:02 GMT
Hello Sam,

What an horrific end to the life of that Ewe. I do hope the Owner will feel sufficient guilt, horror and shame to NEVER allow this to occur again!

On the subject of 'Behaviourists' - I am in full support of a lack of respect or faith in these people. Half the time they clearly do not know the remedy themselves, so will come out with rocket science style prognosis, to convince or confuse!

Hope all goes well for the orphan lambs.

Denise.
By Dawn B (****) [gb] Date 22.04.02 15:09 GMT
Sam
Sorry to hear about the Ewe. I agree how irresponsible people can be, I have 3 Border Terriers and they are 100% with livestock, BUT, I would never have them loose in an unfamiliar place, especially when there were livestock present. I hope they do compensate you for your loss and realise what a foolish, insensitive,dangerous and downright irresponsible thing they have done!
Dawn B
By JacquiN (***) [gb] Date 22.04.02 17:01 GMT
'If' the Boxer is insured, it should be covered for damage to other's property/animals....personally, I'd sue the pants off 'em...What an idiot!!

Sorry for your ewe Sam! :-(
By butter [ca] Date 22.04.02 20:10 GMT
Sam

I doubt if the woman feels remorse. She was already aware of what could happen and of what did happen. If she had felt remorse the first time, then she would never have let her dog off leash or go anywhere near the sheep. I think you have to hit the neighbours where it hurts so that THEY will control their daughter. Ask the neighbors to pay for the loss of the sheep and for the hours and hours you will spend raising these lambs. Also get a restraining order ???(is that possible) against the daughter being on your property again.

Butter
By avaunt [gb] Date 22.04.02 22:09 GMT
I think the problem with the woman feeling remorse Sam is the fact that people get dogs, most with the best intention, and then only ever hear of behaviourists.

Behaviourists have an abysmal rate of training failure and if any dog, including mine, was untrained then the dog will be a problem.

Behaviourists have a commercial interest to get people to belive there is another problem and that 'the' problem is not one of the dog not being satisfacoralily trained but something else.

They then give advice on that one 'seeming' problem knowing full well another problem will show and the client returns again and again, therby maintaining an income for a behaviourist.

If a dog is trained, appropriate to its breed and individuality, it DOES NOT have these problems.

You are a farmer Sam, you presumably train your dogs if you have any, I would like your comment on what I have written.
By sam (*****) [gb] Date 23.04.02 08:53 GMT
Interesting theory, never occured to me before! I know I am usually considered a bit,well, blunt, in my opinions on behaviourists, but in my experience, people over react to the slightest little thing, rush to the vet, who in turn tells them they need a behaviorist, and its all utter nonsense. A bit of sensible discipline from day one wouldn't go amiss.....same goes for children! I think that there is more good advice given out on this board in any 24 hours (for free!!) than in a whole lifetime of behaviourists, no doubt at £10 an hour or something!. When that Boxer chased a sheep the first time, they should have got it in with some rams, on a lunge line, and let it get beaten up a bit......soon puts them off! As for telling her it was ok because they live in the town, well I think we have had this conversation before, but it goes to show some people can be so idiotic.
training a dog according to its breed, another idea I had not given any thought to, but I guess its automatically what I do with mine. I do not expect the scent hounds to be obedience champions so I do not train them in that way, but when I had two dobes I DID expect them to be mega obedient! The deerhound has to be trained differently because the mear sight of something moving 2 miles away causes much excitement, so her training is structured very differently.
By Jude [gb] Date 23.04.02 10:16 GMT
Sam

Being a farming person myself, though I rarely post I do understand where you are coming from with most of your postings, even if I don't always agree with you.:-) On this occasion I feel I have to post and say you are to be congratulated on your attitude once calmed down, towards the absolute stupidity of those responsible for the Boxer. I am still seething with anger on your behalf. I know with certainty that if this occurrance had taken place in my immediate area, that dog would have been shot. Best of luck with the orphans....as if there isn't enough to do at this time of year!!!!
By Julieann [gb] Date 23.04.02 11:34 GMT
Ouch! Just don't understand people some times? For a start if your unsure on what your dog will do around sheep it stays on the lead or you don't take dogs near farm animals at all surely? Sam under the circamstances I feel very cross for you on this one. You have so much to do this time of year as the other poster said. When we were away in Scotland on our walks Molly was on her lead at all times as the sheep were all around us. She showed not one sign of being bothered with them but she remained on her lead. Is that not common Sense???

Julieann
By Jude [gb] Date 23.04.02 17:26 GMT
Julieann

Yes, that is common sense!!!
You wouldn't believe the number of walkers who let their dogs have a good run loose on the mountain amongst the sheep, and when confronted as to why the dog is not on a lead, the stock answer is "he/she won't touch sheep"....and that is supposed to make it alright? Ok let a 'safe' dog have a run around on open land, but not in the middle of a flock of sheep no matter how stock proof the dog is!
By sam (*****) [gb] Date 23.04.02 21:18 GMT
....& the sheep aren't to know if a dog will attack them or not....they just panic anyway, usually causing abortions or worse damage.
By eoghania [de] Date 27.04.02 16:34 GMT
Hopefully this will be a normal sized box. My eyes are gettting really messed up reading the narrow columns.... call it genetic inheritance from parents, grandparents, & great grandparents to give the blessing of being the fourth generation to wear glasses. :D

Avaunt, since you have clearly stated that you have never been involved in breeding & its arena, all you are stating repeatedly is theory. Basically it sounds as if your hobby is dealing with the concept of Eugenics..in dogs & not humans this time around. Remember, a little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing :rolleyes:

Repeating something a vet said to you in 1970 is very old & does appear to be unsubstantiated. Just because he bred Chows, doesn't mean that he knew first hand what he was talking about. Were you able to confirm his story by another means --newspaper report, book, other breeders? Does it really matter today?

I live in Germany. I see people breeding their GSDs & Dobies just like other pet owners in the US & UK.... they have a pretty dog & think its best for a bitch to have pups, or they want to make money. Perhaps those Germans that you know are extra special & have perfect motives for proper breeding, but there are many Germans outside of your acquaintance. You shouldn't presume to put the entire dog owning population on a pedestal and hold them in superior status than your own British citizenry. You keep insulting British breeders and their dogs, even down to individuals on this board. Shame on you. That's not very polite to do.

John, Good to hear from you again..... Hemophilia in Dogs??????? I didn't know there was such a thing. Don't vanish again or I'll send you harrassing emails :D :D :D
toodles cool
By mattie (*****) [gb] Date 27.04.02 17:36 GMT
I wonder if people who insult British dogs have actually been abroad and seen the standard of dogs in other countries? (in real life I mean) speaking for my own breed when friends who are judges go abroad, and going off the write ups in the dog press.they find the best dogs have been bred from imported British stock,and a friend has just come back from another Country recently and the standard was appalling.British dogs are in Big demand abroad,when I was at the ringside at crufts with someone who had just got a great win foreigners were offering silly amounts of money for the dog.(lottery numbers in fact) strange if our dogs are so bad. confused
On the subject of genetics I would feel it prudent to only post on what you have a good sound knowledge of in view of the stream of visitors we get on here,we dont want to give them incorrect info do we? :-)
glenys
By avaunt [gb] Date 27.04.02 17:43 GMT
Eugiana
Its true to some extent the German breeders I have anything to do with put everything into their dogs BUT<<

There is only ONE pedigree recognised in Europe as an authentic German pedigree and that pedigree is endorsed by Dobermann Verin, the German breed club. It is the equivalent of UK kennel club registration.

On top of that all breeders and owners, as standard, attempt the ZTP breeding licence test, no one, would seriously buy a dog without it.

The pedigree authenticates the dog but the licence is proof the dog has been tested to a standard that makes it fit for breeding to DV standards, which are VERY strict You can check with the DV as you are there the number is, 89 123 4224.

No one I have come across in Germany breeding Dobes (although I go to breeders who make the Sch/working, health and the mix priority over showing, they do not show, they go for international working champs) would even contemplate having breeding from a dog which had not entered and passed its ZTP test.

Have you actually asked the people there with Dobes about this?

Yes of course they live like part of the family, so do mine and everyone else I know keep them like that, you seem to equate a dog that has high scores at tracking as a dog which is tied out day and night or some idea peculiar to you.

Do dogs get Haemophilia? I did not know that either.

Below is pasted the Dobermann Verin (German Breed Club) ZTP breeding licence test.
Just one other thing, over there the national kennel club has no say in anything, it is the breed club which licences judges and the national dog club must apply to the breed club to licence judges.

________________________________________
DOBERMANN ZTP
The meaning and purpose of the ZTP is to ascertain those Dobermanns which are - according to the breeding goal (breed standard) - suitable for breeding, and to eliminate unsuitable dogs from the breeding program. ZTP's can only be judged by breed judges. The judge and the helper shall be named by the test giving club's official committee. ZTP's can only be held, if authorization from DV has been given and the event has been published and deadlines have been adhered to. Additionally, ZTP's should only be held if there are at least 10 dogs expected to participate. The maximum number of dogs to be judged in any one day shall be 20. ZTP test-date applications to DV must include the name and address of the test giving club, as well as the name of the ZTP test chairperson, the name of the judge, and the deadline for entries. The exact location and start time of the ZTP test shall also be included. ZTP's are independent events. They cannot be held in conjunction with conformation shows or Schutzhund trials. The ZTP can only be carried out, if on the day of the test, the judge is presented with at least 8 dogs, and if the test location is deemed suitable for the test. The ZTP judge shall be responsible for determining the suitability of the test location. All Dobermanns which have been bred according to the breeding requirements of the DV and have been properly x-rayed for hip-displaysia, can participate in the ZTP. The results of the x-rays have to be submitted on the day of the test. Furthermore there has to be a successful test of obedience (BH). Foreign bred Dobermanns, whose owners have their permanent residence in Germany, have to have proper transfer papers. Foreign bred Dobermanns can participate in any ZTP, as long as all DV requirements have been met. The minimum age for dogs participating in a ZTP is 14 months. Dogs which have been "Held-Back" (did not pass) at an earlier ZTP, can only be re-entered once their waiting period has expired. Dogs which do not pass the ZTP the second time they are judged, cannot be entered again. The test chairperson checks the required documents and prepares the test papers. S/He is also responsible for the uninterrupted completion of the entire test, as well as the availability of all equipment necessary for the test. A suitable Schutzhund helper has to be available.!! There has to be an insurance for this test. All dogs in the testing location have to be kept so as not to disturb the testing in any way. Prong collars are not permitted on dogs, during any part of the test.
TEST PROCEDURE
1. Examination for the Conformation Ratings
2. Temperament Testing
Reasons for elimination of a dog are further discussed later in this writing. Aggressive, Shy or fearful dogs shall be excluded from breeding.
3. Determination and Announcement of ZTP Ratings
If the ZTP is held the day before a conformation show with the same judge, and the same dog is entered in both ZTP and conformation show, then the ZTP rating will be announced the day of the conformation show. Dogs will be judged first, followed by bitches. The observations of the judge shall be entered in the ZTP papers and signed by the test chairperson. The decisions of the judge and his conformation and temperament ratings are indisputable. Objections regarding formal errors must be brought to the test chairperson's attention on the day of the test. If a resolution cannot be achieved, the matter is to be presented to the officers of the DV for a decision. The ZTP rating is applicable for the duration of the dog's breeding age, unless revoked by a DV committee, because of newly discovered or earlier concealed genetic faults. This revocation of a ZTP rating must be made in writing to the owner via a registered letter. No dogs owned by the judge or his immediate family can participate in a test judged by him. After conclusion of the test, it's results are to be given to each dog's owner, co-owner or handler. A duplicate has to be sent to DV within 3 days following the test. Another duplicate shall be given or sent to the officiating judge. All financial matters shall be settled immediately.
JUDGING RULES AND PERFORMANCE REGULATIONS
Prior to the start of the ZTP, the judge briefly explains to all competitors the meaning and purpose of the test, and the exercises involved. At the start of testing the competitor and his dog report to the judge. The test chairperson checks the authenticity of the dog's pedigree with the use of the dog's tattoo. In a conversation with the handler the judge informs himself about the training, care and possible changes in ownership of the dog presented to him. The conformation evaluation is done according to the guidelines set forth by the governing club, its rules and regulations and breed standard. Special attention should be paid to faults which would affect working ability, such as a weak muzzle, long weak back, faults of front and rear legs as well as bad movement. !! Deviation in body dimensions by more than 2 cm have to be judged by reduction of conformation ratings. Greater deviations are leading to exclusion of breeding. Dogs with faults of their dentition - such as less than 42 teeth, deviations in the tooth pattern, or overshot/undershot bites, are to be deemed unsuitable for breeding purposes. The behavior of the dog during the examination of the mouth is to be specially noted, as it may be serve as an indication for certain temperament problems.
Minimum Rating Required for Males: Very Good

Minimum Rating Required for Females: Good

After the conformation evaluation the judge will instruct the handler to lead his dog in different directions over the testing area for a duration of about 300 paces, with the dog's leash being held loosely. During this walk, the dog/handler team has to encounter 4 to 6 persons who are either moving or stationary. After this, those 4 to 6 persons will form a group. The group formation should not be in any particular stiff and rigid pattern. Here the judge is encouraged to vary the proceedings, in as much as he orders the movement of the group towards the handler with his dog, or the movement of the handler/dog team in the group. During the stop in the group, it is important to create situations which are as natural as possible, such as they occur in day to day life (i.e. meeting a stranger by shaking his hand, dropping of items, opening of an umbrella, etc.). During above said exercise it is particularly important not to show any threat towards the dog. It shall strictly be used to evaluate the dog's self-confidence, fearlessness, temperament, obedience and threshold of stimulation.After this the judge orders the handler and his dog to the previously determined tie out location, where the handler ties up the dog without the use of obedience commands such as "Down" or "Platz", and goes out of sight of his dog. During the time the dog and handler are walking to the tie out location, two gunshots shall be discharged from a distance of about 15 paces, using 6mmammunition.Gun-shy dogs are unsuitable for breeding; gun-sensitivity is to be strictly distinguished from gun-shyness.

The tie-out location is to be freely accessible from all sides (i.e. away from walls, fences, etc.).

!! The dog has to be left alone for about 5 min. The judge shall approach the dog from a distance of about 5 to 8 steps, and either pass him or walk around him at a distance of approximately 2 to 3 steps, without threatening him in any way.
!! He stops in front or beside the dog, drops an exercise book or something similar. The behavior of the dog in the absence of it's handler is to be specially observed. After this, the handler shall return to his dog and take him out of the testing area. At the direction of the judge the helper shall proceed to the hiding place.
Part 1.
The judge will direct the handler to walk his dog into a specific direction. The dog shall be on leash.> At the direction of the judge, the helper will now come out of the hiding place and attack the handler and dog from the front. The dog should show his protective instincts and protect his handler. The helper starts threatening the dog only after he has engaged in the fight. During the fight the dog will be threatened verbally and physically, but does not receive any stick-hits. Upon order from the judge, the helper stops the attack.
Part 2.
The helper now turns away, and starts running a distance of about 50 paces. The handler holds the dog by his collar only, first shouting at the helper to> stop, then sending the dog. The helper flees first, but at the direction of the judge turns and attacks the dog, when he has gotten as close as approximately 8 to 10 steps. The helper tries to threaten the dog again, however even here there shall be no stick-hits used.
The handler may, at his discretion encourage the dog verbally. Upon order from the judge, the helper shall stop the attack. The handler shall return to the dog, place him back on leash, and report back to the judge.
Notes for Part 1:
It is very important that the helper wears a protective suit consisting of pants and jacket. The stick used for threatening, shall not be too bendable. The helper must be carry insurance for this test-work. The hiding place shall definitely be variable so that no pattern training of local club dogs can be done. Cars, corners or recesses of walls or tree/shrub groups can be selected for
this purpose. The helper can only work upon order from the judge, in other words, the attack and the end-position are determined by the judge. The attack will always be done towards the front of the handler, not the dog. If the dog engages in the fight, the helper will turn to the dog and threaten him verbally and physically. The stick can be used only as a threat, but never to actually hit the dog. The dog is allowed to bite the helper in locations other than the arm.
Notes for Part 2:
The helper must absolutely go to about 50 paces distance. The judge will instruct the helper, as to when to launch the attack on the dog, at which time the helper must threaten the dog verbally and physically. The stick will again be used as threat only.
CHARACTER CLASSIFICATION
There are four possible classifications:
1A
1B
Held-Back
Unsuitable for Breeding
1A
Dogs which are overall correct. A "1A" can only be awarded to a dog which gives a completely sure and correct impression in the static as well as the fighting periods of the test.
1B
Dogs which are overall sufficient. A "1B" will be awarded to a dog which performs acceptable in the static periods of the test and which shows some protective and fighting drives.
Held-Back
Dogs must be rated "Held-Back" if there is sufficient doubt about the dog's behavior as it relates to soundness of temperament and breed-suitability. A dog so rated may not be shown to another judge, until the expiration of a 3 month waiting period. A dog can only be rated "Held-Back" one time.
Unsuitable for Breeding
Shy, nervous and timid dogs can not be rated suitable for breeding.
By John (*****) [gb] Date 27.04.02 18:06 GMT
Hi Fiona.
The reasons for testing are many and varied. For a pet owner it maybe is not too critical but it is nice for the owner’s peace of mind to know if there is a problem. It’s also extremely useful to the breeder as the more info they can get about their line the better. For someone who works their dogs it is important, I for example would not want to waste months training a puppy only for it to go blind! Obviously for a breeder it is imperative that they do all they can to screen their breeding stock!

From the point of view of Cockers, there are three conditions to be tested. Central Progressive Retinal Atrophy and Generalised Progressive Retinal Atrophy should be tested yearly and Primary Glaucoma which is a once in a lifetime test. The percentage of Cockers suffering with Glaucoma is quite small but I would definitely test for it if I was you because it is an extremely painful condition and one which could mean a dog having to have, in the worst case, both eyes removed! Two other conditions which are being investigated are Persistent Pupillary Membrane and what is known as Multiocular defects which is in fact a number of rare defects lumped together under one heading.

The interesting thing about CPRA with regard to the above thread is that although it has long been recognised as a genetic fault, as a result of studies carried out by Prof. Peter Bedford and financed by the Guide Dogs for the Blind it is now known to not be a genetic fault at all! Hence the ill advisability of quoting old info!!!

Toodles, haemophilia in the German GSD is said to be only in known lines and has been for quite a few years now. I got to hear about it in the ‘60’s so if eradicating it is as simple as indicated in the above posts and if the German breeders are as contentious as again stated above it should be long gone by now. The fact is that it is NOT easy to breed a genetic problem out or even knowing for certain what dogs are affected! In fact about the only ailment I know of which has been to any degree improved on is the Night Blindness in Irish Setters of the 40’s and 50’s in this country which is although not unknown, certainly quite rare now.

After the tail of your post Toodles, I don’t think I’d dare go again! :d

Regards, John
By Ingrid (****) [gb] Date 27.04.02 18:26 GMT
Welcome back John, haemophillia is one of the normal test that should be done on GSDs for breeding. I know absolutely nothing about dog genetics so I'm not getting involved, I only know what I like and that GSD that got BOB at Crufts was a Europen dog and I didn't think much of that at all. Ingrid
By mattie (*****) [gb] Date 27.04.02 18:26 GMT
Thanks for that John its nice to read things in easy to understand text,sometimes I get blinded by science, confused you make it so easy to digest. :-)
Incidently My Vicky had glaucoma and had to have an eye removed,m glad they can test for it now.
xx
glenys
By John (*****) [gb] Date 27.04.02 18:37 GMT
Glaucoma can occure in almost any breed Mattie but it is very rare in Labradors I'm glad to say. The trouble then of course is that because it is so rare, we are not on the list for testing so when it occures it occures without us having any thought that it might even be a possibility!

Best wishes, John
By issysmum [gb] Date 27.04.02 18:28 GMT
thanks John, you're a star :D

Fiona
x x x
Previous Next Up Topic Dog Boards / Behaviour / IRRESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR (locked)


Powered by mwForum 2.12.1 © 1999-2007 Markus Wichitill